[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160912065656.GA2411@ktx>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:56:56 +0800
From: Phidias Chiang <phidias.chiang@...onical.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Yu C Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not mask all interrupts on probe
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:05:06AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:58:32AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 04:23:58PM +0800, Phidias Chiang wrote:
> >
> > Only other place where we touch INTMASK register is
> > chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(). Can you add some debug there to find out the
> > caller?
>
> Something like this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c
> index 0fe8fad..95fa3b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c
> @@ -1357,6 +1357,11 @@ static void chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool mask)
> value |= BIT(intr_line);
> chv_writel(value, pctrl->regs + CHV_INTMASK);
>
> + if (printk_ratelimit()) {
> + dev_info(pctrl->dev, "%smask pin %u intmask 0x%08x\n",
> + mask ? "" : "un", pin, readl(pctrl->regs + CHV_INTMASK));
> + }
> +
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chv_lock, flags);
> }
>
With printk_ratelimit():
[ 2.058485] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: INTMASK0: 0x00000006
[ 2.058513] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 0 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058533] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 1 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058551] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 2 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058569] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 3 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058587] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 4 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058604] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 5 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058623] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 6 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058641] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 7 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.058663] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: mask pin 15 intmask 0x00000006
[ 2.059401] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: INTMASK1: 0x00000000
[ 2.059551] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:01: INTMASK0: 0x00004000
[ 2.061272] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:01: INTMASK1: 0x00000000
[ 2.061516] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:02: INTMASK0: 0x00000000
[ 2.061906] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:02: INTMASK1: 0x00000000
[ 2.062116] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:03: INTMASK0: 0x00000000
[ 2.062956] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:03: INTMASK1: 0x00000000
w/o printk_ratelimit():
http://pastebin.com/dLDELDB4
The main difference is the intmask turns to 0x4 on pin 75 and 0x0
afterwards for INT33FF:00. And same thing happened with :01 on pin 25
Powered by blists - more mailing lists