lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 07:56:50 +0100 From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> To: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com> Cc: joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: drm/i915: undefined symbol I915_SW_FENCE_CHECK_DAG On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 08:46:39AM +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > Hi Chris, > > your commit e68a139f6bf3 ("drm/i915: Add a sw fence for collecting up > dma fences") has shown up in today's linux-next (i.e., 20160912) > adding the following the lines (184++): > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I915_SW_FENCE_CHECK_DAG)) > + return false; > > The Kconfig symbol isn't defined anywhere, so the function will always > return false. I could not find a patch on LKML adding the symbol. Is > there a patch queued somewhere or is the yet unconditional return > intentional? The patch is queued up elsewhere. It's part of the selftests. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists