linux-kernel - [PATCH] driver: base: pinctrl: return error from pinctrl_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57D7A700.8080402@mentor.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:43:04 +0530
From:   Deepak <deepak_das@...tor.com>
To:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        vzapolsk <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] driver: base: pinctrl: return error from pinctrl_bind_pins()

strict pin controller returns -EINVAL in case of pin request which
is already claimed by somebody else.
Following is the sequence of calling pin_request() from
pinctrl_bind_pins():-
pinctrl_bind_pins()->pinctrl_select_state()->pinmux_enable_setting()->
pin_request()

But pinctrl_bind_pins() only returns -EPROBE_DEFER which makes device
driver probe successful even if the pin request is rejected by the pin
controller subsystem.

This commit modifies pinctrl_bind_pins() to return error if the pin is
rejected by pin control subsystem.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Das <deepak_das@...tor.com>
---
  drivers/base/pinctrl.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/pinctrl.c b/drivers/base/pinctrl.c
index 0762975..e65c1af 100644
--- a/drivers/base/pinctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/base/pinctrl.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ cleanup_alloc:
      dev->pins = NULL;

      /* Only return deferrals */
-    if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+    if ((ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) && (ret != -EINVAL))
          ret = 0;

      return ret;
-- 
1.9.1