[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160913121245.3217e23d@bbrezillon>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:12:45 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.vger.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/atmel-aic: Fix potential deadlock in ->xlate()
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:10:09 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> aic5_irq_domain_xlate() and aic_irq_domain_xlate() take the generic chip
> lock without disabling interrupts, which can lead to a deadlock if an
> interrupt occurs while the lock is held in one of these functions.
>
> Replace irq_gc_{lock,unlock}() calls by
> raw_spin_{lock_irqsave,unlock_irqrestore}() ones to prevent this bug from
> happening.
>
Forgot to mention that this problem was discovered by kernelci [1].
[1]https://storage.kernelci.org/arm-soc/v4.4-2499-gbb46b50a5130/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-free-electrons/boot-at91-sama5d3_xplained.html
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> Fixes: b1479ebb7720 ("irqchip: atmel-aic: Add atmel AIC/AIC5 drivers")
> Cc: <stable@...nel.vger.org>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c
> index 112e17c2768b..447a8b0f1395 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ static int aic_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> {
> struct irq_domain_chip_generic *dgc = d->gc;
> struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> + unsigned long flags;
> unsigned smr;
> int idx;
> int ret;
> @@ -194,11 +195,11 @@ static int aic_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
>
> gc = dgc->gc[idx];
>
> - irq_gc_lock(gc);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->lock, flags);
> smr = irq_reg_readl(gc, AT91_AIC_SMR(*out_hwirq));
> aic_common_set_priority(intspec[2], &smr);
> irq_reg_writel(gc, smr, AT91_AIC_SMR(*out_hwirq));
> - irq_gc_unlock(gc);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gc->lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c
> index 4f0d068e1abe..8c024107fd03 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic5.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int aic5_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned int *out_type)
> {
> struct irq_chip_generic *bgc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, 0);
> + unsigned long flags;
> unsigned smr;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -269,12 +270,12 @@ static int aic5_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - irq_gc_lock(bgc);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bgc->lock, flags);
> irq_reg_writel(bgc, *out_hwirq, AT91_AIC5_SSR);
> smr = irq_reg_readl(bgc, AT91_AIC5_SMR);
> aic_common_set_priority(intspec[2], &smr);
> irq_reg_writel(bgc, smr, AT91_AIC5_SMR);
> - irq_gc_unlock(bgc);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bgc->lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists