[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0359b2c7-cda5-b744-7051-4b19af0fcfcd@st.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:34:48 +0200
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: Add IRQ related
properties of STM32 pinctrl
Hi Linus,
On 09/13/2016 10:18 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Alexandre TORGUE
> <alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.txt
>> index 587bffb..a0eed99 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.txt
>> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properies:
>> - #size-cells : The value of this property must be 1
>> - ranges : defines mapping between pin controller node (parent) to
>> gpio-bank node (children).
>> + - interrupt-parent: phandle of the interrupt parent to which the external
>> + GPIO interrupts are forwarded to.
>> + - st,syscfg: phandle of the syscfg node used for IRQ mux selection.
>
> Actually this doc is incomplete.
>
> This is a phandle + offset, not just a phandle.
>
> It is a small detail so I don't care much, either send a patch to
> fix up this doc (I have already merged it) or patch the driver
> to not retrieve the offset and instead use
> #define SYSCFG_OFFSET 0x08
> or something...
I'll send a patch for Documentation.
Do I need to wait this series is officially released (4.9-rc1) or can I
send it now ?
Regards
Alex
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists