[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18457294.js4cyg49EU@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:31:29 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: initialize ret to zero to avoid returning garbage
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 12:04:00 PM CEST Phil Reid wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 21:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >>
> >> ret is not initialized so it contains garbage. Ensure garbage
> >> is not returned in the case that pdata && pdata->teardown is false
> >> by initializing ret to 0.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > Patch applied.
> G'day Linus,
>
>
> I believe this does the same as Arnd Bergmanns patch from 26 Aug.
> [PATCH 1/5] gpio: pca954x: fix undefined error code from remove
>
> IMO Colin's is the cleaner solution.
> Arnd's could be removed.
>
Please try to avoid adding initializations in the local variable
declaration, they just hide otherwise useful warnings when
you get a function that actually does something incorrect
in some code paths.
See also https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists