[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160913183726.GB32416@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:37:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: sstabellini@...nel.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
jgross@...e.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: consolidate swiotbl_xen dma_ops
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:45:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Please organize such initializers better! Something like this:
>
> > Makes it much easier to review such definitions.
>
> That's my personal preference, too. But this is just moving/consolidating
> code, so I don't plan to do fancy moves.
I can be passive-aggressive too, so:
NAKed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
If the ugliness that makes the patch much harder to review than it should be is
fixed in the same patch or in a different patch then:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists