[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEfhGiwGwpW2i3nepxxvYbtpHcOEHQcj5XovUa5Usi3CQfuaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:59:20 -0400
From: Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] genirq: Machine-parsable version of /proc/interrupts
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Craig Gallek wrote:
>> +What: /sys/kernel/irq/<irq>/name
>> +Date: September 2016
>> +KernelVersion: 4.9
>> +Contact: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
>> +Description: Human-readable flow handler name as defined by the device
>> + driver.
>
> That's ambigous. device driver reads like a the driver of the device which
> uses this irq. I fixed that up.
>
>> static void free_desc(unsigned int irq)
>> {
>> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>>
>> unregister_irq_proc(irq, desc);
>> + kobject_del(&desc->kobj);
>
> You forgot to move this under the sparse lock protection as well. There is
> the same race against a concurrent initcall.
Good catch, thank you for the review and accepting this code.
Craig
Powered by blists - more mailing lists