linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <82853D52-0D6B-42EC-8900-5575A92123E6@goldelico.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:28:12 +0200
From:   "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@...il.com>,
        David Rivshin <drivshin@...worx.com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz

Hi,

> Am 14.09.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>:
> 
> * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [160910 02:10]:
>>> Am 10.09.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@...il.com>:
>> 
>> But with the patch submitted, I just want to give the dts of a single
>> device I have even designed a more reasonable value than in current
>> linux/master and don't really want to make it a fundamental discussion...
> 
> So what's the verdict here on this patch? Should we wait for the driver
> to get fixed?

No, because it are indeed two issues which can (and should) be fixed independently.
This one just makes the urgency of the other bug smaller.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus