linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:12:38 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc:     Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@...il.com>,
        David Rivshin <drivshin@...worx.com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM
 frequency to 83Hz

* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [160913 21:29]:
> Hi,
> 
> > Am 14.09.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>:
> > 
> > * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [160910 02:10]:
> >>> Am 10.09.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@...il.com>:
> >> 
> >> But with the patch submitted, I just want to give the dts of a single
> >> device I have even designed a more reasonable value than in current
> >> linux/master and don't really want to make it a fundamental discussion...
> > 
> > So what's the verdict here on this patch? Should we wait for the driver
> > to get fixed?
> 
> No, because it are indeed two issues which can (and should) be fixed independently.
> This one just makes the urgency of the other bug smaller.

OK applying into omap-for-v4.9/dt thanks.

Tony