linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Minimize checkpatch induced patches...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <b01a4cea-083f-682c-6399-8ac9d55f2ae0@de.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:24:34 +0200
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Minimize checkpatch induced patches...

On 09/14/2016 08:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 20:16 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> You know what. 
>> with some additional writing like 
>> "Existing code outside staging is not supposed to be "fixed" to match checkpatch.
>> Please do not send checkpatch initiated patches for those files"
>> near the newly created warn
> 
> That's not to my taste.
> That should be in the Documentation tree somewhere.

Fine with me. maybe in SubmitingPatches?