linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 21/22] bpf,landlock: Add optional skb pointer in the Landlock context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160914212054.GC57174@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:20:55 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
        Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 21/22] bpf,landlock: Add optional skb pointer in the
 Landlock context

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> This is a proof of concept to expose optional values that could depend
> of the process access rights.
> 
> There is two dedicated flags: LANDLOCK_FLAG_ACCESS_SKB_READ and
> LANDLOCK_FLAG_ACCESS_SKB_WRITE. Each of them can be activated to access
> eBPF functions manipulating a skb in a read or write way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
...
>  /* Handle check flags */
>  #define LANDLOCK_FLAG_FS_DENTRY		(1 << 0)
> @@ -619,12 +621,15 @@ struct landlock_handle {
>   * @args: LSM hook arguments, see include/linux/lsm_hooks.h for there
>   *        description and the LANDLOCK_HOOK* definitions from
>   *        security/landlock/lsm.c for their types.
> + * @opt_skb: optional skb pointer, accessible with the
> + *           LANDLOCK_FLAG_ACCESS_SKB_* flags for network-related hooks.
>   */
>  struct landlock_data {
>  	__u32 hook; /* enum landlock_hook_id */
>  	__u16 origin; /* LANDLOCK_FLAG_ORIGIN_* */
>  	__u16 cookie; /* seccomp RET_LANDLOCK */
>  	__u64 args[6];
> +	__u64 opt_skb;
>  };

missing something here.
This patch doesn't make use of it.
That's something for the future?
How that field will be populated?
Why make it different vs the rest or args[6] ?