lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a063d76e-940c-5c68-bfca-fc0d99305411@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:22:35 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@...zon.de>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not



On 15/09/2016 07:54, Raslan, KarimAllah wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/06/2016 04:34, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
>>> pfn_valid check is not sufficient because it only checks if a page has a struct
>>> page or not, if for example "mem=" was passed to the kernel some valid pages
>>> won't have a struct page. This means that if guests were assigned valid memory
>>> that lies after the mem= boundary it will be passed uncached to the guest no
>>> matter what the guest caching attributes are for this memory.
>>
>> How can you pass memory after the mem= boundary to the guest?
> 
> Does my previous reply answer your question?

Yes, but I'm not sure it's the right way to do it.  Looking at the e820
memory map seems pretty hacky.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ