[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85E2C33C-8873-4CC8-8D31-9A85C30F8DB5@amazon.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:54:43 +0000
From: "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@...zon.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not
> On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/06/2016 04:34, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
>> pfn_valid check is not sufficient because it only checks if a page has a struct
>> page or not, if for example "mem=" was passed to the kernel some valid pages
>> won't have a struct page. This means that if guests were assigned valid memory
>> that lies after the mem= boundary it will be passed uncached to the guest no
>> matter what the guest caching attributes are for this memory.
>
> How can you pass memory after the mem= boundary to the guest?
Does my previous reply answer your question?
>
> Paolo
>
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
Powered by blists - more mailing lists