linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/34] clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160915003605.GJ7243@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:36:05 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/34] clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk_hw based registration
 and OF APIs

On 06/02, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org> writes:
> 
> > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
> > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
> > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
> > consumer and provider clk APIs.
> 
> This looks good, but it'll conflict with the fixes for 4.7.  Could we
> land those first and then put this commit on top of that?

Done and merged to clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project