[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160915003933.GK7243@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:39:33 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/34] clk: at91: Migrate to clk_hw based registration
and OF APIs
On 06/07, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:36:21 +0200
> Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > On 01/06/2016 at 16:15:01 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote :
> > > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
> > > can get rid of struct clk pointers in this driver, allowing us to
> > > move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs.
> > >
> > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> > > Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
> >
> > Well, apart the same comment about alignement:
> >
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> > Tested-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>
Ok I fixed the alignment and pushed to clk-next.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists