[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP045ArWoAzt3rPmZixEFFsZj3NVawAYOhT9j6D-Ow-ZOMmn8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:20:39 -0700
From: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR INTERFACE"
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86 Test and expose CPUID faulting capabilities in /proc/cpuinfo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Dave Hansen
>> <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/14/2016 02:01 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
>
>>> Is any of this useful to optimize away at compile-time? We have config
>>> options for when we're running as a guest, and this seems like a feature
>>> that isn't available when running on bare metal.
>>
>> On the contrary, this is only available when we're on bare metal.
>> Neither Xen nor KVM virtualize CPUID faulting (although KVM correctly
>> suppresses MSR_PLATFORM_INFO's report of support for it).
>
> KVM could easily support this. If rr starts using it, I think KVM
> *should* add support, possibly even for older CPUs that don't support
> the feature in hardware.
>
> It's too bad that x86 doesn't give us the instruction bytes on a
> fault. Otherwise we could lazily switch this feature.
We are *very* interested in having KVM and Xen support virtualization
of this feature. I am planning to work on KVM after I get this series
of patches in :)
- Kyle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists