[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1474207110-16111-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 21:58:30 +0800
From: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
To: jingoohan1@...il.com, inki.dae@...sung.com,
jy0922.shim@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, airlied@...ux.ie, kgene@...nel.org,
krzk@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, baoyou.xie@...aro.org, xie.baoyou@....com.cn
Subject: [PATCH] drm/exynos: mark exynos_dp_crtc_clock_enable() static
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c:46:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'exynos_dp_crtc_clock_enable' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks it 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
index 4f08505..528229f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct exynos_dp_device {
struct analogix_dp_plat_data plat_data;
};
-int exynos_dp_crtc_clock_enable(struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data,
+static int exynos_dp_crtc_clock_enable(struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data,
bool enable)
{
struct exynos_dp_device *dp = to_dp(plat_data);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists