linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/61] perf tools: Introduce c2c_decode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:15:30 -0500
From:   Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/61] perf tools: Introduce c2c_decode_stats function

On 19 September 2016 at 08:09, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h
> index 7f69bf9d789d..27c6bb5abafb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
>  #define __PERF_MEM_EVENTS_H
>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include "stat.h"
>
>  struct perf_mem_event {
>         bool            record;
> @@ -33,4 +37,36 @@ int perf_mem__lck_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, struct mem_info *mem_info);
>
>  int perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf(char *bf, size_t size, struct mem_info *mem_info);
>
> +struct c2c_stats {
> +       int     nr_entries;
> +
> +       int     locks;               /* count of 'lock' transactions */
> +       int     store;               /* count of all stores in trace */
> +       int     st_uncache;          /* stores to uncacheable address */
> +       int     st_noadrs;           /* cacheable store with no address */

No address! Why would that happen?


--
Nilay