[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2aa8d6d7-b489-e51e-dc18-fceb5300f6d2@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:13:42 -0700
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
To: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame
On 09/19/2016 06:21 PM, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> Thank you for your patches. I applied them, and verified that
> unwinding works with code that is compiled into the kernel image as
> well as kernel modules.
> I confirmed that the .eh_frame section is present and that the
> .debug_frame section is absent. I also verified that the file size of
> the .ko files are small enough for our embedded platform and that
> unnecessary sections like .debug_info, .debug_line, .debug_str etc.
> are also absent.
> Is there anything else you want me to test?
> Thanks
> Daniel
Nope - that is it. Just wanted to make sure it is "field" tested :-)
Thx,
-Vineet
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Vineet Gupta
> <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Give these a shot and let me know if they work fine for you.
>> I'm working on some more improvements to unwinder which will follow
>> a bit later.
>>
>> Thx,
>> -Vineet
>>
>> Vineet Gupta (3):
>> ARC: module: support R_ARC_32_PCREL relocation
>> ARC: dw2 unwind: factor CIE specifics for .eh_frame/.debug_frame
>> ARC: dw2 unwind: switch to .eh_frame based unwinding
>>
>> arch/arc/Makefile | 2 ++
>> arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
>> arch/arc/kernel/entry.S | 12 ------------
>> arch/arc/kernel/module.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
>> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>> arch/arc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 15 +++++----------
>> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists