[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE2F3rA0FrrNiHe6W6DSqYmpTyTiVD3h-wpGtW7rJ07RJLqqgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:21:48 -0700
From: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame
Hi Vineet,
Thank you for your patches. I applied them, and verified that
unwinding works with code that is compiled into the kernel image as
well as kernel modules.
I confirmed that the .eh_frame section is present and that the
.debug_frame section is absent. I also verified that the file size of
the .ko files are small enough for our embedded platform and that
unnecessary sections like .debug_info, .debug_line, .debug_str etc.
are also absent.
Is there anything else you want me to test?
Thanks
Daniel
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Give these a shot and let me know if they work fine for you.
> I'm working on some more improvements to unwinder which will follow
> a bit later.
>
> Thx,
> -Vineet
>
> Vineet Gupta (3):
> ARC: module: support R_ARC_32_PCREL relocation
> ARC: dw2 unwind: factor CIE specifics for .eh_frame/.debug_frame
> ARC: dw2 unwind: switch to .eh_frame based unwinding
>
> arch/arc/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
> arch/arc/kernel/entry.S | 12 ------------
> arch/arc/kernel/module.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/arc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 15 +++++----------
> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists