lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609201141120.6905@nanos>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:47:16 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, lisa.parratt@...tec.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] remoteproc/MIPS: Add a remoteproc driver for
 MIPS

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> +/* Intercept CPU hotplug events for syfs purposes */
> +static int mips_rproc_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
> +			       void *hcpu)
> +{

Please convert to cpu hotplug state machine.

> +	unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> +	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> +		mips_rproc_device_unregister(cpu);
> +		break;
> +	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> +		mips_rproc_device_register(cpu);
> +		break;
> +	}

There is no reason why you need to setup the rproc device on
DOWN_PREPARE. It's sufficient to do that when the CPU is dead, so you can
use a symetric callback prep/dead.

> +	/* Dynamically create mips-rproc class devices based on hotplug data */
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +		if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> +			mips_rproc_device_register(cpu);
> +	register_hotcpu_notifier(&mips_rproc_notifier);
> +	put_online_cpus();

Perhaps we should add support for "reverse" functionality to the state
machine core. I'll have a look later how hard that'd be.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ