linux-kernel - Re: GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0248eabf-9b9e-e43d-0ea4-63d1cad626c0@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:03:06 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision
 mismatch in mid_get_vbt_data()

>>> A single error message should be sufficient to inform about
>>> the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end.
>>> Thus return after the logging call in this case directly.
>>
>> Did you test this?
>>
> 
> Don't be a dummy...  This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.

Thanks for this kind of constructive feedback.


> I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.

Would you like to clarify such an information a bit more?


> I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
> history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback.

I admit that I'll stumble on programming mistakes again occasionally
as another ordinary free software developer who is struggling various open issues.

I am listening to various feedback. My responses might not be pleasing enough
for you. Are you looking for any special information to improve
a corresponding discussion?

Regards,
Markus