[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160920111442.GA17516@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:14:42 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs tree
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:03:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 47b34458fc93 ("lustre: use %pD")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> bb5c7f2630de ("staging: lustre: changelog: fix comparison between signed and unsigned")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
> index 23249b3e6cad,5d4d17f2de61..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
> @@@ -1141,8 -1123,8 +1123,8 @@@ ll_file_io_generic(const struct lu_env
> struct cl_io *io;
> ssize_t result;
>
> - CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "file: %pD, type: %d ppos: %llu, count: %zd\n",
> - CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "file: %s, type: %d ppos: %llu, count: %zu\n",
> - file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name, iot, *ppos, count);
> ++ CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "file: %pD, type: %d ppos: %llu, count: %zu\n",
> + file, iot, *ppos, count);
Fixup looks good to me, thanks for doing this.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists