[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F91A724AB9@lhreml503-mbx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:50:02 +0000
From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"Huwei (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>,
oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>,
"Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
"mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH for-next 03/20] IB/hns: Add the check for pointer ctrl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:08 AM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: dledford@...hat.com; Huwei (Xavier); oulijun; Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen);
> xuwei (O); mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 03/20] IB/hns: Add the check for pointer
> ctrl
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:30:34PM +0800, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > From: Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>
> >
> > The pointer ctrl may be null, so we add check for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wei Hu <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > index 5f76fc1..ea47ec4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > @@ -336,6 +336,12 @@ int hns_roce_v1_post_recv(struct ib_qp *ibqp,
> struct ib_recv_wr *wr,
> > }
> >
> > ctrl = get_recv_wqe(hr_qp, ind);
> > + if (unlikely(!ctrl)) {
>
> Yes, as you wrote, this check and patch are redundant too.
I have dropped this patch in reworked V2 patch and introduced new patch
to remove the redundant code as well in get_recv_wqe() and get_send_wqe().
Thanks
Salil
>
> > + dev_err(dev, "Get recv wqe failed!\n");
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + *bad_wr = wr;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > roce_set_field(ctrl->rwqe_byte_12,
> > RQ_WQE_CTRL_RWQE_BYTE_12_RWQE_SGE_NUM_M,
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma"
> in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists