[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F91A724AFE@lhreml503-mbx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:56:35 +0000
From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"Huwei (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>,
oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>,
"Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
"mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH for-next 18/20] IB/hns: Update the rq head when modify
qp state
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon@...nel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:13 AM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: dledford@...hat.com; Huwei (Xavier); oulijun; Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen);
> xuwei (O); mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 18/20] IB/hns: Update the rq head when
> modify qp state
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:30:49PM +0800, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > From: Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>
> >
> > The rq head in qpc was zero will miss the rq wqes which
> > have be sent, so here we should take the real value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > index bdd9453..7a61d7e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > @@ -2266,7 +2266,8 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_m_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp,
> const struct ib_qp_attr *attr,
> >
> > roce_set_field(context->qpc_bytes_68,
> > QP_CONTEXT_QPC_BYTES_68_RQ_HEAD_M,
> > - QP_CONTEXT_QPC_BYTES_68_RQ_HEAD_S, 0);
> > + QP_CONTEXT_QPC_BYTES_68_RQ_HEAD_S,
> > + hr_qp->rq.head);
>
> Are you sure that it should be list_head and not value?
This is correct. Variable head is not list_head but a u32 value.
Hope I understood your point correctly.
Best regards
Salil
>
> > roce_set_field(context->qpc_bytes_68,
> > QP_CONTEXT_QPC_BYTES_68_RQ_CUR_INDEX_M,
> > QP_CONTEXT_QPC_BYTES_68_RQ_CUR_INDEX_S, 0);
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma"
> in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists