[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160920204725.GA10804@localhost>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:47:25 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Cc: Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.lian@....com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pci/aer: interrupt fixup in the quirk
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:09:18AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> I checked the updated kernel with Dongdong mentioned ACPI patch which was truly affected my quirk patch uploaded. So I suppose the quirk patch is not qualify to fix the bug.
I don't understand what you're saying here.
The quirk worked on your machine. It apparently didn't work on
Dongdong's machine because of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() is run after the
quirk in this path:
pci_device_probe
pcibios_alloc_irq # arm64
dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci
and of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() returned zero, probably because
of_irq_parse_pci() failed. My guess is that the reason it works on
your machine but not Dongdong's is that your DTs are different such
that of_irq_parse_pci() works for you but not for Dongdong.
I think the idea of of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() is to set up a device's
INTx line. But that doesn't quite apply here because your device
doesn't actually *use* INTx. So I don't know why of_irq_parse_pci()
works for you. Maybe that's a symptom of a problem in your DT.
Or maybe you're saying that the quirk *didn't* work on your machine
when you tested it in a kernel that included d8ed75d59332 ("ARM64:
PCI: ACPI support for legacy IRQs parsing and consolidation with DT
code"). But that doesn't make sense either, because prior to
d8ed75d59332, we *always* set
dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
and after the patch we only do it if "acpi_disabled". I guess I just
don't understand what you're saying.
> I were keep thinking what your "explicitly checking for a root port device" meaning. Do you mean I should upload again the first version patch which fix it in the portdrv_core.c ? I would upload again if yes.
No, I did not mean you should go back to the first version of the
patch. If we *can* do this in a quirk, I think that would be much
better than doing it in the PCIe port driver. I meant that Dongdong's
suggestion of adding this:
if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
return;
to your quirk made sense to me.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 6:42 AM
> > To: Po Liu
> > Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Roy Zang; Arnd
> > Bergmann; Marc Zyngier; Stuart Yoder; Yang-Leo Li; Minghuan Lian; Murali
> > Karicheri; Bjorn Helgaas; Shawn Guo; Mingkai Hu
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pci/aer: interrupt fixup in the quirk
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:24:05PM +0800, Po Liu wrote:
> > > On some platforms, root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode.
> > > When chip support the aer interrupt with none MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode,
> > > maybe there is interrupt line for aer pme etc. Search the interrupt
> > > number in the fdt file. Then fixup the dev->irq with it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
> >
> > I'm not sure where we're at with this. Dongdong had some issue
> > (possibly with a version of the quirk on a different platform?), and I
> > think the suggestion of explicitly checking for a root port device was a
> > good one.
> >
> > So please update and repost this for next cycle.
> >
> > > ---
> > > changes for V3:
> > > - Move to quirk;
> > > - Only correct the irq in RC mode;
> > >
> > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c index
> > > ee72ebe..8b39cce 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > > #include <linux/ktime.h>
> > > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > #include <asm/dma.h> /* isa_dma_bridge_buggy */
> > > #include "pci.h"
> > >
> > > @@ -4419,3 +4420,31 @@ static void quirk_intel_qat_vf_cap(struct
> > pci_dev *pdev)
> > > }
> > > }
> > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x443,
> > > quirk_intel_qat_vf_cap);
> > > +
> > > +/* If root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode,
> > > + * but use standalone irq. Read the device tree for the aer
> > > + * interrupt number.
> > > + */
> > > +static void quirk_aer_interrupt(struct pci_dev *dev) {
> > > + int ret;
> > > + u8 header_type;
> > > + struct device_node *np = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + /* Only for the RC mode device */
> > > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_HEADER_TYPE, &header_type);
> > > + if ((header_type & 0x7F) != PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (dev->bus->dev.of_node)
> > > + np = dev->bus->dev.of_node;
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && np) {
> > > + ret = of_irq_get_byname(np, "aer");
> > > + if (ret > 0) {
> > > + dev->no_msi = 1;
> > > + dev->irq = ret;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, PCI_ANY_ID,
> > > +quirk_aer_interrupt);
> > > --
> > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists