[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474441172.27308.19.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:59:32 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 09:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> This patch introduces a new futex implementation called
> throughput-optimized (TO) futexes.
nit: 'TO' sounds way too much like timeout... TP? You even use 'to' as
shorthand for timeout in the next patch.
> /*
> -> > > * Wake robust non-PI futexes here. The wakeup of
> -> > > * PI futexes happens in exit_pi_state():
> +> > > * Wake robust non-PI/TO futexes here. The wakeup of
> +> > > * PI/TO futexes happens in exit_pi_state():
> > > > */
nit: comment attracted my eye during high speed scroll-by.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists