[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57E319BE.2050208@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:37:34 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes
On 09/21/2016 02:59 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 09:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> This patch introduces a new futex implementation called
>> throughput-optimized (TO) futexes.
> nit: 'TO' sounds way too much like timeout... TP? You even use 'to' as
> shorthand for timeout in the next patch.
I agree. I am not that satisfied with the TO name. So I will change it
to TP in my next revision of the patch. Thanks for the suggestion.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists