[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1474500923-84047-1-git-send-email-nilesh.bacchewar@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:35:23 -0700
From: Nilesh Bacchewar <nilesh.bacchewar@...el.com>
To: mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: intel: Configure GPIO chip IRQ as wakeup interrupts
On some Intel BXT platform, wake-up from suspend-to-idle on pressing
power-button is not working. Its noticed that gpio-keys driver marking the
second level IRQ/power-button as wake capable but Intel pintctrl
driver is missing to mark GPIO chip/controller IRQ which first level IRQ
as wake cable if its GPIO pin IRQ is wakeble. So, though the first level
IRQ gets generated on power-button press, since it is not marked as
wake capable resume/wake-up flow is not happening.
Intel pintctrl/GPIO driver need to mark GPIO chip/controller IRQ (first
level IRQ) as wake capable iff GPIO pin's IRQ (second level IRQ) is marked
as wake cable.
Changes in v2:
- Add missing irq initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Nilesh Bacchewar <nilesh.bacchewar@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 33 +++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 257cab1..63387a4 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct intel_pinctrl_context {
* @communities: All communities in this pin controller
* @ncommunities: Number of communities in this pin controller
* @context: Configuration saved over system sleep
+ * @irq: pinctrl/GPIO chip irq number
*/
struct intel_pinctrl {
struct device *dev;
@@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ struct intel_pinctrl {
struct intel_community *communities;
size_t ncommunities;
struct intel_pinctrl_context context;
+ int irq;
};
#define pin_to_padno(c, p) ((p) - (c)->pin_base)
@@ -793,38 +795,12 @@ static int intel_gpio_irq_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- const struct intel_community *community;
unsigned pin = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
- unsigned padno, gpp, gpp_offset;
- unsigned long flags;
- u32 gpe_en;
-
- community = intel_get_community(pctrl, pin);
- if (!community)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
- padno = pin_to_padno(community, pin);
- gpp = padno / community->gpp_size;
- gpp_offset = padno % community->gpp_size;
-
- /* Clear the existing wake status */
- writel(BIT(gpp_offset), community->regs + GPI_GPE_STS + gpp * 4);
-
- /*
- * The controller will generate wake when GPE of the corresponding
- * pad is enabled and it is not routed to SCI (GPIROUTSCI is not
- * set).
- */
- gpe_en = readl(community->regs + GPI_GPE_EN + gpp * 4);
if (on)
- gpe_en |= BIT(gpp_offset);
+ enable_irq_wake(pctrl->irq);
else
- gpe_en &= ~BIT(gpp_offset);
- writel(gpe_en, community->regs + GPI_GPE_EN + gpp * 4);
-
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ disable_irq_wake(pctrl->irq);
dev_dbg(pctrl->dev, "%sable wake for pin %u\n", on ? "en" : "dis", pin);
return 0;
@@ -905,6 +881,7 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
pctrl->chip.label = dev_name(pctrl->dev);
pctrl->chip.parent = pctrl->dev;
pctrl->chip.base = -1;
+ pctrl->irq = irq;
ret = gpiochip_add_data(&pctrl->chip, pctrl);
if (ret) {
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists