linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] arch/x86/platform/uv: BAU UV4 add version-specific functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160921125527.GA6424@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:55:27 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hpa@...or.com, travis@....com, rja@....com, sivanich@....com,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] arch/x86/platform/uv: BAU UV4 add version-specific
 functions


* Andrew Banman <abanman@....com> wrote:

> Add the UV4-specific function definitions and define an operations struct
> to implement them in the BAU driver.
> 
> Many BAU MMRs, although functionally the same, have new addresses on UV4
> due to hardware changes. Each MMR requires new read/write functions, but
> their implementation in the driver does not change. Thus, it is enough to
> enumerate them in the operations struct for the changes to take effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>
> Acked-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> Acked-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c    | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
> index a7a93a5..57ab86d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
> @@ -664,6 +664,16 @@ static inline void write_gmmr_activation(int pnode, unsigned long mmr_image)
>  	write_gmmr(pnode, UVH_LB_BAU_SB_ACTIVATION_CONTROL, mmr_image);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void write_mmr_proc_payload_first(int pnode, unsigned long mmr_image)
> +{
> +	write_gmmr(pnode, UV4H_LB_PROC_INTD_QUEUE_FIRST, mmr_image);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void write_mmr_proc_payload_last(int pnode, unsigned long mmr_image)
> +{
> +	write_gmmr(pnode, UV4H_LB_PROC_INTD_QUEUE_LAST, mmr_image);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void write_mmr_payload_first(int pnode, unsigned long mmr_image)
>  {
>  	write_gmmr(pnode, UVH_LB_BAU_INTD_PAYLOAD_QUEUE_FIRST, mmr_image);
> @@ -709,6 +719,26 @@ static inline unsigned long read_gmmr_sw_ack(int pnode)
>  	return read_gmmr(pnode, UVH_LB_BAU_INTD_SOFTWARE_ACKNOWLEDGE);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void write_mmr_proc_sw_ack(unsigned long mr)
> +{
> +	uv_write_local_mmr(UV4H_LB_PROC_INTD_SOFT_ACK_CLEAR, mr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void write_gmmr_proc_sw_ack(int pnode, unsigned long mr)
> +{
> +	write_gmmr(pnode, UV4H_LB_PROC_INTD_SOFT_ACK_CLEAR, mr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long read_mmr_proc_sw_ack(void)
> +{
> +	return read_lmmr(UV4H_LB_PROC_INTD_SOFT_ACK_PENDING);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long read_gmmr_proc_sw_ack(int pnode)
> +{
> +	return read_gmmr(pnode, UV4H_LB_PROC_INTD_SOFT_ACK_PENDING);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void write_mmr_data_config(int pnode, unsigned long mr)
>  {
>  	uv_write_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_BAU_DATA_CONFIG, mr);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
> index 56d12eb..470d73c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,17 @@ static struct bau_operations uv123_bau_ops = {
>  	.write_payload_last = write_mmr_payload_last,
>  };
>  
> +static struct bau_operations uv4_bau_ops = {
> +	.bau_gpa_to_offset = uv_gpa_to_soc_phys_ram,
> +	.read_l_sw_ack = read_mmr_proc_sw_ack,
> +	.read_g_sw_ack = read_gmmr_proc_sw_ack,
> +	.write_l_sw_ack = write_mmr_proc_sw_ack,
> +	.write_g_sw_ack = write_gmmr_proc_sw_ack,
> +	.write_payload_first = write_mmr_proc_payload_first,
> +	.write_payload_last = write_mmr_proc_payload_last,
> +};

The series looks mostly good to me, only a minor nit: could you please organize 
such initializations vertically?

Something like:

	.bau_gpa_to_offset	= uv_gpa_to_soc_phys_ram,
	.read_l_sw_ack		= read_mmr_proc_sw_ack,
	.read_g_sw_ack		= read_gmmr_proc_sw_ack,
	.write_l_sw_ack		= write_mmr_proc_sw_ack,
	.write_g_sw_ack		= write_gmmr_proc_sw_ack,
	.write_payload_first	= write_mmr_proc_payload_first,
	.write_payload_last	= write_mmr_proc_payload_last,

would make it more readable. Same might apply to other patches too in the series.

Plus it might make sense to do the same to the existing tunables[] structure as 
well.

Thanks,

	Ingo