[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160921023132.rz2rutdtrxuu4c7r@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:31:32 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy
Hi Kees,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:17:36PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
>> [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc7 next-20160919]
>
>Hah, and here I thought if I didn't mark it with "[PATCH]" 0-day would
>skip it! ;)
>
>Is there a way to mark "just FYI" patches that go to the list to get
>skipped by 0-day?
The 0-day bot will auto skip emailed patches without "Signed-off-by: ".
Will that be enough? I can also add the "[PATCH...]" detect.
Thanks,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists