linux-kernel - Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJmah3pwatk3+pSK_eYsdgLXqi+7-R5Ti3BZbACP6Wrwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:41:10 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:17:36PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kees,
>>>
>>> [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
>>> [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc7 next-20160919]
>>
>>
>> Hah, and here I thought if I didn't mark it with "[PATCH]" 0-day would
>> skip it! ;)
>>
>> Is there a way to mark "just FYI" patches that go to the list to get
>> skipped by 0-day?
>
>
> The 0-day bot will auto skip emailed patches without "Signed-off-by: ". Will
> that be enough? I can also add the "[PATCH...]" detect.

Ah, perfect, I'll just leave out my S-o-B next time. Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security