[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160921025229.cjwnhvbqao3x7h5i@treble>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:52:29 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86/entry/head/32: use local labels
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:57:16PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2016 10:03 AM, "Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add the local label prefix to all non-function named labels in head_32.S
> > and entry_32.S. In addition to decluttering the symbol table, it also
> > will help stack traces to be more sensible. For example, the last
> > reported function in the idle task stack trace will be startup_32_smp()
> > instead of is486().
> >
>
> I think that restore_all, at least, should stay. It's a common tail
> for lots of functions. I haven't checked this patch for other cases
> where the new label is worse than the old for debugging.
Yes, for restore_all, I think you're right. I'll change it back.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists