linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] x86/sched: Add SD_ASYM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <201609220431.K417mkWJ%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 04:27:33 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, rjw@...ysocki.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] x86/sched: Add SD_ASYM_PACKING flags to x86
 ITMT CPU

Hi Tim,

[auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc7 next-20160921]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core tip/sched/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Srinivas-Pandruvada/Support-Intel-Turbo-Boost-Max-Technology-3-0/20160922-032652
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-x014-201638 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c: In function 'x86_core_flags':
>> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:501:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_core_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     return cpu_core_flags() | x86_sched_itmt_flags();
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c: In function 'x86_smt_flags':
   arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:506:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_smt_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     return cpu_smt_flags() | x86_sched_itmt_flags();
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   At top level:
   arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:504:12: warning: 'x86_smt_flags' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    static int x86_smt_flags(void)
               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:499:12: warning: 'x86_core_flags' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    static int x86_core_flags(void)
               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/cpu_core_flags +501 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c

   495	{
   496		return sysctl_sched_itmt_enabled ? SD_ASYM_PACKING : 0;
   497	}
   498	
   499	static int x86_core_flags(void)
   500	{
 > 501		return cpu_core_flags() | x86_sched_itmt_flags();
   502	}
   503	
   504	static int x86_smt_flags(void)

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (24578 bytes)