[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1609211612280.42217@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@...o.com>
cc: zijun_hu@....com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/vmalloc.c: correct a few logic error for
__insert_vmap_area()
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, zijun_hu wrote:
> > We don't support inserting when va->va_start == tmp_va->va_end, plain and
> > simple. There's no reason to do so. NACK to the patch.
> >
> i am sorry i disagree with you because
> 1) in almost all context of vmalloc, original logic treat the special case as normal
> for example, __find_vmap_area() or alloc_vmap_area()
The ranges are [start, end) like everywhere else. __find_vmap_area() is
implemented as such for the passed address. The address is aligned in
alloc_vmap_area(), there's no surprise here. The logic is correct in
__insert_vmap_area().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists