linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if APICv is inactive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANRm+Cwdi2za1cw2gaQHApKWDESDP_KXhoaQ=MFoA-5uC3cBfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:17:55 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@...il.com>,
        Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if APICv is inactive

2016-09-22 0:35 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>:
> 2016-09-21 10:14+0800, Wanpeng Li:
[...]
> Could only be "else" without if here.  I'll change that when refactoring
> of vmx bitmap handling, posting soon (hopefully).
>
[...]
>
> Pasto here (disable vs. enable).  It's not called with !apicv_active and
> the refactoring will delete the whole function, so

Your refactoring is based on this patch, right? So I will send out v4
to fix the issue which you pointed out in this patch for further
bisect.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li