lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160922203201.33pwuzd3lncyjncf@zver>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:32:02 +0300
From:   Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@...tmail.com>
To:     Jannik Becher <becher.jannik@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: wlan-ng: fixed a coding style issue

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:11:46PM +0200, Jannik Becher wrote:
> removed a space after a cast to obtain the coding style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jannik Becher <Becher.Jannik@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c
> index 40627d5..ecd2fff 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void p80211req_handle_action(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u32 *data,
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------*/
>  int p80211req_dorequest(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u8 *msgbuf)
>  {
> -	struct p80211msg *msg = (struct p80211msg *) msgbuf;
> +	struct p80211msg *msg = (struct p80211msg *)msgbuf;
>  
>  	/* Check to make sure the MSD is running */
>  	if (!((wlandev->msdstate == WLAN_MSD_HWPRESENT &&

checkpatch.pl shows that in this file there are other occurances of
style deviations - of same or other kinds. Could you please present work
on wider scope, e.g. on whole wlan-ng/, or at last making this one file
to pass checkpatch.pl --strict cleanly?

Not that I don't appreciate this small achievement, but I believe
maintainers won't merge this one, exactly because there is more work of
same kind in the same file.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ