[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2910910.lNZx7XPZak@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:42:35 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@...gutronix.de>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix merge conflict
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:50:49 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
> and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
> an unused function in place:
>
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> This removes it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
> Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
> ---
Hi Vinod,
I still see the warning in linux-next, can you apply the patch?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists