[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160923034556.GJ2609@localhost>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:15:57 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@...gutronix.de>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix merge conflict
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:42:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:50:49 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
> > and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
> > an unused function in place:
> >
> > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> >
> > This removes it again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
> > Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
> > ---
>
> Hi Vinod,
>
> I still see the warning in linux-next, can you apply the patch?
Applied, now. Sorry had missed earlier
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists