[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
|
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609231831170.5640@nanos>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:41:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
cc: baohua@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] clocksource/timer-imx-gpt: Preventing resource leakage
in error case.
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Arvind Yadav wrote:
So last time (V2) you had a almost perfect subject line:
clocksrouce/timer-imz-gpt: Prevent resource leaks in error path
The only issue was the clocksrcouce typo. Now you made it:
clocksource/timer-imx-gpt: Preventing resource leakage in error case.
Documentation/SubmittingPatches says:
Describe your changes in imperative mood ... as if you are giving orders
to the codebase to change its behaviour.
"Preventing" is not imperative and the above is not a proper sentence,
while the V2 one is.
> ret = _mxc_timer_init(imxtm);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (ret) {
> + goto error_iounmap;
> + }
Further Documentation/SubmittingPatches also tells you which tools to use
_before_ submission. If you'd used them then the above change would look
different. You surely can figure that out yourself.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists