linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] x86/vmd: Add PCI domain specific LED option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:57:02 -0400
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] x86/vmd: Add PCI domain specific LED option

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:34:41AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I made the necessary changes to match the renaming I did in the first
> patch, and I also used plain old "#ifdef" instead of "#if IS_ENABLED"
> since the rest of the file uses the former style.  If there's a reason
> to switch, we should change the whole file in a separate patch so we
> can explain the rationale.

The check was "IS_ENABLED" because VMD can be a loadable module, which
fails the ifdef check. I see Fengguang 0'dayed it using the module
configuration option. I can send you a fix based on your pci/hotplug
branch, or revert and apply the original patch if you prefer.

BTW, you had asked me not to split a series when incremental fixes
touched a single patch. I didn't resend the whole series here, and while
you got the right patches, I apologize for making it more difficult to find.