lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160923214730.GF21232@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:47:30 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        jason@...edaemon.net, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
        gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
        alior@...vell.com, tn@...ihalf.com, jaz@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: mvebu: migrate CP110 system controller to
 clk_hw API and registration

On 09/21, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> @@ -203,80 +202,75 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	cp110_clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct clk *),
> -				  CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!cp110_clks)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> -				      sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
> +	cp110_clk_data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
> +				      sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
>  				      GFP_KERNEL);

This doesn't look right. Why are calloc()ing clk_hw_onecell_data this
way?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ