[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPv3WKfDrtDDMPi4oBmpNN_+b4mvG6cVnZT7pNTo8tcNUyzwyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 00:00:01 +0200
From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clément
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>, nadavh@...vell.com,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: mvebu: migrate CP110 system controller to
clk_hw API and registration
Hi Stephen,
2016-09-23 23:47 GMT+02:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>:
> On 09/21, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>> @@ -203,80 +202,75 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - cp110_clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct clk *),
>> - CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!cp110_clks)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> - cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> - sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
>> + cp110_clk_data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
>> + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> This doesn't look right. Why are calloc()ing clk_hw_onecell_data this
> way?
After some time, at a first sight it seems I should've used following:
cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data) +
sizeof(struct
clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
GFP_KERNEL);
I'll re-check, but is that what you meant?
Best regards,
Marcin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists