lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160923215654.GB106495@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:56:54 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, david@...ma-star.at, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Check for encryption feature before
 fscrypt_process_policy()

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:38:03PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 
> I think it's fine to fix it now in upstream.  It might cause some
> problems for Cyanogen developers if they want to try to use an
> upstream kernel and also enable the ext4 encryption feature, but the
> fix to make_ext4fs isn't all that hard.

Would it make sense to at least provide a helpful error message in the kernel
log?  For example:

		if (!ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb)) {
			ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
				 "warning: process `%s' tried to set "
				 "encryption policy on filesystem without "
				 "encryption enabled.  This is not supported.  "
				 "Use 'tune2fs -O encrypt' to enable the "
				 "encryption feature flag first.",
				 current->comm);
			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
		}

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ