linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] Input-gameport: Replace some printk() calls by pr_info() in joydump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160924163912.GA40187@dtor-ws>
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:39:12 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Input-gameport: Replace some printk() calls by
 pr_info() in joydump_connect()

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:32:29PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> @@ -57,27 +57,29 @@ static int joydump_connect(struct gameport *gameport, struct gameport_driver *dr
> >>>  	unsigned long flags;
> >>>  	unsigned char u;
> >>  
> >>> -	printk(KERN_INFO "joydump: ,------------------ START ----------------.\n");
> >>> -	printk(KERN_INFO "joydump: | Dumping: %30s |\n", gameport->phys);
> >>> -	printk(KERN_INFO "joydump: | Speed: %28d kHz |\n", gameport->speed);
> >>> +	pr_info(",------------------ START ----------------.\n"
> >>> +		"| Dumping: %30s |\n"
> >>> +		"| Speed: %28d kHz |\n",
> >>> +		gameport->phys,
> >>> +		gameport->speed);
> > 
> > Not the same output.
> 
> Should the desired output be the same when the relevant data are passed by a single function call
> (instead of three as before)?

The desired output should not be broken in conversion, which you did. Do
you know how syslog works and why the transformation is not correct.

I am also curious as to why you are patching joydump? Are you working on
extending it?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry