[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwtHAT_ukyE=+s=3twW8v8QExLxpVcfEDyLihf+pn9qeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:52:27 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, tbsaunde@...aunde.org,
robert@...llahan.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT_NONE NUMA balancing
I was kind of assuming this would go through the normal channels for
THP patches, but it's been two weeks...
Can I have an ACK from the involved people, and I'll apply it
directly.. Mel? Rik?
Linus
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com> wrote:
> Just a quick ping on this, let me know if you need anything more from me!
>
> Thanks, Lorenzo
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:54:25PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> The NUMA balancing logic uses an arch-specific PROT_NONE page table flag defined
>> by pte_protnone() or pmd_protnone() to mark PTEs or huge page PMDs respectively
>> as requiring balancing upon a subsequent page fault. User-defined PROT_NONE
>> memory regions which also have this flag set will not normally invoke the NUMA
>> balancing code as do_page_fault() will send a segfault to the process before
>> handle_mm_fault() is even called.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists