linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:20:59 +0200
From:   Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
        Franky Lin <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER" 
        <brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking



On 26-9-2016 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>>
>>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
>>> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
>>> firmware.
>>
>> The problem we are trying to solve is a pretty old one. The problem is
>> that wpa_supplicant uses two separate code paths: EAPOL messaging
>> through data path and key configuration though nl80211.
> 
> Can I find it described/reported somewhere?

Not sure. It is something that I recall from working at Intersil so back
in the prism days.

Regards,
Arend

>>> Unfortunately our old tracking code wasn't very accurate. It was
>>> treating skb as pending as soon as it was passed by the netif. Actual
>>> handling packet to the firmware was happening later as brcmfmac
>>> internally queues them and uses its own worker(s).
>>
>> That does not seem right. As soon as we get a 1x packet we need to wait
>> with key configuration regardless whether it is still in the driver or
>> handed over to firmware already.
> 
> OK, thanks.
>