[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160926163451.crahi5tvvdcc5psu@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:34:51 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Removal of regulator-boot-on/always-on when a consumer exists
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:26:24AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> My suggestion is to remove regulator-boot-on/regulator-always-on:
> reg_3p3v: regulator-3p3v {
> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> regulator-name = "3P3V";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> };
> ,since reg_3p3v has can1 as its consumer.
> Is my understanding correct?
It really depends on what the actual board constraints are - are there
other consumers that aren't visible to software, is it electrically safe
to power down the rail?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists