lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160926163451.crahi5tvvdcc5psu@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:34:51 -0700
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Removal of regulator-boot-on/always-on when a consumer exists

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:26:24AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:

> My suggestion is to remove regulator-boot-on/regulator-always-on:

>        reg_3p3v: regulator-3p3v {
>                compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>                regulator-name = "3P3V";
>                regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>                regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>        };

> ,since reg_3p3v has can1 as its consumer.

> Is my understanding correct?

It really depends on what the actual board constraints are - are there
other consumers that aren't visible to software, is it electrically safe
to power down the rail?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ