[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CPF7XLQihx_g4VcBzP=FVeuZ+gCY=t6N_NoUzLHgmb8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:43:28 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Removal of regulator-boot-on/always-on when a consumer exists
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> It really depends on what the actual board constraints are - are there
> other consumers that aren't visible to software, is it electrically safe
> to power down the rail?
The can1 node is the only consumer of this regulator.
The reg_3p3v regulator models a discrete 3.3V power supply with no
software intervention.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists